This entry was posted
on Tuesday, July 31st, 2007 at 4:31 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
14 Responses to “Where does George Bush rank in comparison to Presidents of the 20th and 21st century?”
In the middle right now, but could improve depending on the outcome of Iraq. His library will be in Texas, probably in Arlington next to the ball park of the baseball team he used to own the Texas Rangers.
Well I think to be fair, he will need to be judging in a decade or 2. Too many people don’t like him right now. I don’t think that he will be ranked as high as 20th century Presidents like the 2 Roosevelts, and Kennedy; however I think he has done much better than Presidents like Harding, Coolidge, Hoover, Taft, Truman, Eisenhower, Johnson, and Carter. He should probably be in the top 5 between 1901-2008.
Well, as the only president of the 21st Century, he is both first and last in rank. Since he wasn’t president until the 21st Century (Jan 2001), he doesn’t even rank in the past century.
Future historians will judge his presidency according to their own views of things just as current historians judge past presidents. Some will say he prevented Saddam from getting too powerful and conquering most of the Middle East, others will say Saddam would have given up dreams of conquest anyway.
The problem with the whole “lessons of history” concept is that one never really knows what would have happened if things were done differently, and one never really knows which “lesson of history” or whose version of it applies to the current situation.
Presidents can only do what they think is best and hope for it was for the best.
Last. Next to his father’s.
Too early to say, will will need to see some more info after his administration is out to determine how effective he truly was.
Presidents should be judged through the spectacles of the historian. Right now, too many items are still removed from public eyes.
He’s one of them. His monument (library) is being erected on the SMU campus.
#1, he does what he want when he wants, and the country cant say or do shit, he even got reellectted for it…..why complain about it.
Currently he’s ranking as the worst. Next to Nixon.
His monument? Hopefully in Texas where it belongs.
To answer your question;
In the middle right now, but could improve depending on the outcome of Iraq. His library will be in Texas, probably in Arlington next to the ball park of the baseball team he used to own the Texas Rangers.
He’s done pretty good for a “stupid cowboy!” The Dems control the House and Senate and still can’t beat him…….
Near last if not dead last, this has been one of the most harmful presidencies in US history, anyone who says otherwise has no idea of global politcs.
Well I think to be fair, he will need to be judging in a decade or 2. Too many people don’t like him right now. I don’t think that he will be ranked as high as 20th century Presidents like the 2 Roosevelts, and Kennedy; however I think he has done much better than Presidents like Harding, Coolidge, Hoover, Taft, Truman, Eisenhower, Johnson, and Carter. He should probably be in the top 5 between 1901-2008.
On the bottom.
Bahrain.
In my opinion he will be the worst… he will be lower than Harding, Hoover and Carter.
George W. Bush is the worst president in US History.
Well, as the only president of the 21st Century, he is both first and last in rank. Since he wasn’t president until the 21st Century (Jan 2001), he doesn’t even rank in the past century.
Future historians will judge his presidency according to their own views of things just as current historians judge past presidents. Some will say he prevented Saddam from getting too powerful and conquering most of the Middle East, others will say Saddam would have given up dreams of conquest anyway.
The problem with the whole “lessons of history” concept is that one never really knows what would have happened if things were done differently, and one never really knows which “lesson of history” or whose version of it applies to the current situation.
Presidents can only do what they think is best and hope for it was for the best.
HE IS THE ONLY PRESIDENT OF TH 21ST CENTURY. AS FOR THE TWENTY I WOULD SAY THIRD BEHIND FDR &
REAGAN & JUST AHEAD OF JFK.